a little knowledge is a dangerous thing

Last week I got my garmin cadence sensor in the mail. I was terribly excited with this toy, although I wasn’t exactly sure what I was to do with it.

A few of my twitter friends, @melissabernais and @paulmoneysmith, sent me some links, from which I learned that a biking cadence of 80-90 is ideal, and that biking at 70 is roughly the equivalent of running an 8 minute mile. I found that particularly interesting, as I seem pretty comfortable biking at 70, and my marathon PR is an 8mm.

Today I set out with Melissa for a ride, with the goal to try to get stay in this 80-90 range. I tend to cycle on a harder gear so that I feel the resistance, but then I am not able to sustain it. I hoped that by forcing a faster turnover I would naturally gear down.

I will admit I’m a bit confused about some of what I’ve read about fast-twitch vs slow-twitch muscle fibers. I have always associated fast-twitch fibers as those used by sprinters or short distance runners. As an endurance athlete, I use more slow-twitch fibers. I’ve always made the natural association that fast-twitch = fast turnover, slow-twitch=slower turnover. Yet in an article I read last night about cycling cadence, it stated that it was the fast-twitch fibers that were recruited during times when you were using more power (i.e. harder gear, slower cycling).
I suppose it does make sense when you consider that sprinters have absolutely explosive leg power, but it still seems like the definitions don’t line up.

Every week when I’m out with Melissa I tell her I need to just practice my leg turn-over, with no resistance. Yet to some extent I can’t help but wonder if that means I’m not really leveraging the power I have in my legs from thousands of miles of running. Although perhaps I need to look at it the other way: this cycling will help my running, if not the other way around..

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Sharing is caring:
Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Tumblr Email