<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subject to Change Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.afhill.com/blog/subject-to-change-book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.afhill.com/blog/subject-to-change-book-review/</link>
	<description>Reflections on online strategy, social media marketing, web accessibility and interactive design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 23:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.afhill.com/blog/subject-to-change-book-review/#comment-158804</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afhill.com/blog/?p=992#comment-158804</guid>
		<description>At LexisNexis we tried to integrate UX/HF into the month-long sprints, which was tough as it created little mini-dependencies within the sprints. At the Web Directions North conference the other week I spoke with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wait-till-i.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Christian Heilmann&lt;/a&gt; and he said they did a design cycle every three sprints, where that was the main focus. It&#039;s not entirely &quot;scrum by the book&quot;, but it seems a decent compromise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At LexisNexis we tried to integrate UX/HF into the month-long sprints, which was tough as it created little mini-dependencies within the sprints. At the Web Directions North conference the other week I spoke with <a href="http://www.wait-till-i.com/" rel="nofollow">Christian Heilmann</a> and he said they did a design cycle every three sprints, where that was the main focus. It&#8217;s not entirely &#8220;scrum by the book&#8221;, but it seems a decent compromise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.afhill.com/blog/subject-to-change-book-review/#comment-158799</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afhill.com/blog/?p=992#comment-158799</guid>
		<description>Ah, I like that you have a Twitter ID field!  But that&#039;s neither here nor there.

My company is currently moving towards an agile development framework, and one of the birthing pangs that we&#039;re going through now is identifying how and where and what kind of artifacts UI/HF fits in and needs to bring to the table.  The conversations that we&#039;re having are equal parts interesting and difficult, and there&#039;s going to be a lot of iterations (ha!) on how UI/HF plays to get it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I like that you have a Twitter ID field!  But that&#8217;s neither here nor there.</p>
<p>My company is currently moving towards an agile development framework, and one of the birthing pangs that we&#8217;re going through now is identifying how and where and what kind of artifacts UI/HF fits in and needs to bring to the table.  The conversations that we&#8217;re having are equal parts interesting and difficult, and there&#8217;s going to be a lot of iterations (ha!) on how UI/HF plays to get it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
