<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google devaluing Human-Filtered Directories?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.afhill.com/blog/google-devaluing-directories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.afhill.com/blog/google-devaluing-directories/</link>
	<description>Reflections on online strategy, social media marketing, web accessibility and interactive design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelj72</title>
		<link>http://www.afhill.com/blog/google-devaluing-directories/#comment-190277</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelj72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afhill.com/blog/?p=1128#comment-190277</guid>
		<description>I think they may perhaps be saying to both those big diretories that we don&#039;t think you are all so very important these days, so we are not going to be recommending that people specificially submit to your sites. 
dmoz is certainly in a different boat than yahoo which i do believe maintains a high standard. 9/10 of eveyone i encounter on line about dmoz is a rag against them. google should put a few hundred people in there and reorganize and clean it up, it would be so simple. i could even do it. 
since so many of the google wonkers themselves are bloggers i guess may they are leaning away from directories and towards the social marking and marketing/linking end come from bloggers and social bookmarkers.....we&#039;ll have to read more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they may perhaps be saying to both those big diretories that we don&#8217;t think you are all so very important these days, so we are not going to be recommending that people specificially submit to your sites.<br />
dmoz is certainly in a different boat than yahoo which i do believe maintains a high standard. 9/10 of eveyone i encounter on line about dmoz is a rag against them. google should put a few hundred people in there and reorganize and clean it up, it would be so simple. i could even do it.<br />
since so many of the google wonkers themselves are bloggers i guess may they are leaning away from directories and towards the social marking and marketing/linking end come from bloggers and social bookmarkers&#8230;..we&#8217;ll have to read more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Borders</title>
		<link>http://www.afhill.com/blog/google-devaluing-directories/#comment-104777</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Borders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afhill.com/blog/?p=1128#comment-104777</guid>
		<description>I think Google is just really tired of people buying PageRank with directories and is starting to treat the general ones more and more like a worthless bought link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google is just really tired of people buying PageRank with directories and is starting to treat the general ones more and more like a worthless bought link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

