<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designing the Next Generation of Web Apps (@Media Notes)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.afhill.com/blog/designing-the-next-generation-of-web-apps-media-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.afhill.com/blog/designing-the-next-generation-of-web-apps-media-notes/</link>
	<description>Reflections on online strategy, social media marketing, web accessibility and interactive design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:47:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: afhill</title>
		<link>http://www.afhill.com/blog/designing-the-next-generation-of-web-apps-media-notes/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>afhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.afhill.com/blog/?p=10#comment-3</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One thing I found very interesting is how much they’ve beefed up security. This struck me in light of what Jeff Veen discussed in “Designing the Next Generation of Web Apps“, wherein the user is trusted more with their own experience. This seems moreso to attempt to protect users. Where’s the fun in that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
